Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. Manufacturers Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff in 1934 to recover the sum of $42,865, with interest, as alleged damages for_the failure of the defendant bank to repurchase from him at their full purchase price various stocks and bonds bought by him from the bank during the years between 1924 and 1929. The cause of action is based upon an alleged oral repurchase agreement stated to have been made by the plaintiff with the bank in the year 1924. The complaint asserts that the defendant sought to induce the plaintiff to purchase various securities which the bank then owned or might thereafter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Matter of Morse (Bank of America)New York Court of Appeals · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. WassermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Franklin National Bank v. SkeistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- First National City Bank v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Awotin v. AbramsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Animalfeeds International, Inc. v. Banco Espirito Santo e Comercial de LisboaNew York Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.