Legal Opinion
Gimbel v. Hogg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 14, 1899No. 8PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern-District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
The bill charged the defendants below (here the appellants) with infringement of letters patent Nq. 25,907, issued on August 4,1896, to Frederic M. Parker, assignor to William James Hogg (the complainant), for a design for carpets. The case was heard on bill and answer, and the circuit court, being “of opinion that a decree must be entered imposing the statutory penalty of $250, under Act Feb. 4, 1887 (24 Stat. 387; Supp. Rev. St. 533), for each of the two acts of infringement,” decreed accordingly. (C. C.) 94 Fed. 518. By the “two acts of infringement” is meant the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. StewartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1893
- Pirkl v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1890
- Stewart v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
- Hogg v. GimbelU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Allen Bros. Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1907
- Young v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Bush & Lane Piano Co. v. Becker Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Lichtenstein v. PhippsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908