Legal Opinion

Bond v. Hurd

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1904No. 1,961PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Beaverhead County; M. H. Parlcer, Judge. Action by IT. A. Bond against C. S. Huid, From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER CLAYBERG

prepared the following opinion for the court:

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order refusing a motion for a new trial.

There are three causes of action stated in the complaint— one on account for medical services rendered by plaintiff, at the request of defendant, for the benefit of one William Walters; one on account for medical services rendered by Dr. Miller, at the request of'defendant, for the benefit of one William Walters, and assigned to plaintiff; and one on account of labor performed by one Williams at the request of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Saveland v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Lyon v. JeromeNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Smith v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Abell v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Stephens v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API