Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Tenderloin Health v. Bank of the West

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2017No. 14-17090Published

1Concurring in the judgmentKorman, District Judge

I concur in the decision to reverse and remand to the bankruptcy court, and join all but Part II of the majority opinion. I agree that, under the circumstances of this case, applying 11 U.S.C. § 547(b)(5)’s “greater amount” test requires us to construct a hypothetical liquidation, and that in so doing, we may consider whether a reasonable trustee would bring and win a preference action within the hypothetical Chapter 7 proceedings. I cannot, however, join in the liquidation that the majority constructs in this case, because I cannot agree that the entirety of the $526,402.05 deposit was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. Eckles v. Petco Inc., Interstate (In Re Balducci Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API