Legal Opinion

State v. Tropea

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 22, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

142 N.J. Super. 288 (1976)

361 A.2d 111

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RUSSELL E. TROPEA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 8, 1976.

Decided June 22, 1976.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, BISCHOFF and BOTTER.

Mr. Norman L. Zlotnick argued the cause for appellant (Perskie and Callinan, P.A., attorneys).

Mr. Peter S. Hamerslag, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

2Per curiam

Defendant was found guilty, first in a municipal court and then on appeal and a trial de novo on the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. State v. MortonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. State v. SaundersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TropeaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. State v. MorganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. State v. LutzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. State v. SaundersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API