Burgess v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
The court convicted appellant of felony forgery by possession and assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at forty years imprisonment. Appellant brings seven points of error alleging: (1) insufficient evidence to support the conviction; (2) appellant did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel; (3) appellant did not knowingly and intelligently invoke his right of self-representation; (4) the court failed to properly admonish appellant of the dangers of self-representation; (5) appellant’s waiver of right to counsel failed to comply…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ex parte DupuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Goffney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
- Custard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Jucup, Mario LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.