Legal Opinion
Barclay v. Amtrak
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 8, 2004No. Civ.A.03-CV-2450PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pro se plaintiff Robert A. Barclay (“Barclay”) filed a complaint against Amtrak on April 24, 2003, which, construed liberally, alleges: 1) disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa.C.S.A. § 951 et seq.; 2) invasion of privacy; and 3) defamation. With respect to his disability discrimination claims, Barclay alleges that he was wrongfully terminated,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- P.P. Ex Rel. Michael P. v. West Chester Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008