State v. . Howe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was an indictment for keeping a gambling table, at which certain games of chance were played, tried before Meares, J., at January Term, 1888, of the Criminal Court of New HaNOVER. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
There were two indictments, and the defendant made a motion to the effect that the Solicitor should be required to elect and try only on one. This was refused, and the Court’ruled that the two indictments should be treated as two counts in one indictment.
The first charged, that the defendant, “on the first day of January, etc., * * * * in a certain house of him, the said,W. H. Howe, and in a certain car of him, the said W. H. Howe, with force and arms, at, and in the county aforesaid, did establish, use and keep a certain gaming table, the -said table not being a faro-bank, but commonly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. . WhiteacreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. BracySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- State v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904