Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Arnold

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 1979No. 871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

This case, involving at the surface level the construction of a contract, involves at a deeper level a question of judicial function that transcends mere contract law. When a judge sits as a fact finder, he wears two hats. He is first and foremost the judge — the legal referee — responsible for making rulings of law, including such questions as the admissibility of evidence and whether the evidence is legally sufficient to go to the fact finder. Then, as fact finder, he has the usual jury prerogatives of whether to believe or disbelieve witnesses, how much weight to give testimony and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Houston Pipe Line Company v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Allen v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Mascaro v. Snelling & Snelling of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Stockham v. StockhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. UcheomumuCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API