Rolfs v. Mullins
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Court. — J. H. Applegate, Judge. Action for damages in consequence of collision with automobile resulted in judgment for defendant: The plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The facts are stated in Rolfs, Administrator, v. Mullins, 179 Iowa 1223. As in that case, no objections were interposed to the instructions prior to submission of the issues to the jury, and what was there said disposes of the contentions that want of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff, and negligence of defendant, were conclusively established. A ruling on the admissibility of evidence and a refusal of an instruction requested only require consideration.
l. words and construction: “upon.” I. It appears from the opinion mentioned that defendant was operating his automobile on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Archer v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State ex rel. Barrett v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Courtright v. DeedsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Rolfs v. MullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Little v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sanford v. LuceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953