Legal Opinion

Quick v. DIRECTOR OF STATE OF ALA., ETC.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1981No. Civ. 2649PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an unemployment compensation case. Mrs. Quick, the claimant, appeals.

At the conclusion of the claimant's evidence, the department moved for "a directed verdict" upon the ground that the claimant had not met her burden of proof under § 25-4-77 of the Code of Alabama of 1975, which contains the following provisions:

An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if the director finds that:. . . .(3) He is physically and mentally able to perform work of a character which he is qualified to perform by past experience or training, and he is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Department of Industrial Relations v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF IND. RELATIONS v. HarbinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF INDUS. RELATIONS v. DowneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vinson v. AGAPE of Central Alabama, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Matthews v. MatthewsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Polk v. STATE, DEPT. OF INDUS. RELATIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. McClure v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Cluxton v. CluxtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API