City of Puyallup v. Lacey
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of tbe superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered February 10, 1906, upon sustaining a demurrer to tbe petition, dismissing a condemnation proceeding instituted by a city for tbe purpose of straightening tbe course of a river.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkiu, J.
The city of Puyallup) is a municipal corporation of tbe third class, tbe Puyallup river forming its northerly boundary. On tbe 20th day of September, 1905, tbe city passed an ordinance^
“Providing for the institution of an action for tbe purpose of condemning a right of way across certain described lands for the purpose of straightening tbe course of tbe Puyallup river, along, in front of, and adjoining tbe city of Puyallup^ and for the purpose of appropriating certain lands for said right of way, ascertaining tbe value thereof, and tbe damages sustained by the abutting and adjoining owners by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Spokane v. MerriamWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Tacoma v. TitlowWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. McLeod v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.