Hertz v. Hertz
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County
1Opinion of the Court
SPICER, P.J.,
Plaintiff, Judy Hertz has brought an action for declaratory judgment under the provisions of The Divorce Code, 23 P.S. §206. That section gives either party the right to have the validity or invalidity of a marriage established by decree of court when the validity of the marriage is either denied or doubted.
Defendant in this case is Jack Hertz. Calling the parties plaintiff and defendant becomes tedious after awhile. Referring to them as husband and wife is inappropriate in this type case. Therefore, we opt for the personal and will refer to them as “Judy” and “Jack” respectively.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Estate of GavulaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Dowd v. DowdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980