Legal Opinion
McGinty v. Rue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1992No. 90-35532UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
976 F.2d 737
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
John C. McGINTY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard RUE, M.D.; Margaret Wall, Health Service Manager,
Oregon State Penitentiary; Manfred Maass, Superintendent;
Steven M. Gassner, Assistant Superintendent, Oregon State
Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-35532.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 1992.*
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walters v. LombardoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024