Legal Opinion

Director, Office of Finance of Baltimore County v. Lapenotiere

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1988No. 452PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

We have before us an interplay between two provisions in Md.Ann.Code art. 27—§ 297(b) and § 641—that use the same term, “final disposition”. The question is whether, in the context of this interplay, the definition of the term as used in § 641 governs the meaning of the term as used in § 297(b). We believe that it does, and so we shall affirm a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, sitting in banc.

Section 297 provides for the seizure and forfeiture of certain property used in the violation of the controlled dangerous substance laws. Among the items or categories of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bozman v. Office of Fin., Balto. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Ewachiw v. Director of Finance of Baltimore CityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Geppi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Office of Finance of Baltimore County v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WallsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API