Legal Opinion

Dozack v. Dozack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

At issue on this appeal is whether Supreme Court erred in *318finding that a valid common-law marriage exists between the parties under Pennsylvania law, a marriage which will be recognized by this State (see, Matter of Mott v Duncan Petroleum Trans., 51 NY2d 289, 292). It is conceded that, since plaintiff was still married to another person when she began to cohabit with defendant in Pennsylvania, the relationship was illicit or meretricious at its inception. Under Pennsylvania law, such a relationship is presumed to continue in like manner until the obstacle to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Claim of Mott v. Duncan Petroleum Trans.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Estate of GavulaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In Re Cummings EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Stauffer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API