Legal Opinion

Doe v. Hartnett, No. Cv 96 0134840 (May 8, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 8, 2002No. CV 96 0134840Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a fictitious name by agreement of the parties, has filed this lawsuit for money damages against the defendant Francis Hartnett, Jr. The plaintiff alleges that she was the victim of a sexual assault by a stranger in her home on September 11, 1993. During the course of the subsequent police investigation, the defendant, a distant acquaintance of the plaintiff, had occasion to encounter an officer from the Waterbury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API