Legal Opinion

Thursby v. Kirby

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to confirm the report of a referee. The action was for a partnership accounting, ¡and the referee appointed after the interlocutory judgment to take ■ and state the account reported that defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $1,490. Defendant’s main objection to confirmation is based upon the disallowance by the referee of anything for good will.

The partnership was formed on June 6, 1933, as successor of the corporation Charles J. Kirby, Jr., Inc., of which the two parties were equal owners. It was organized and conducted under the firm name of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. In re the Estate of CaldwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919
  4. In re Rosenberg's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  2. In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  3. Green v. CabellStaunton County Circuit Court · 1977
  4. MacDonald v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API