Legal Opinion
Hays v. Langley ex rel. Beaird
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 16, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Debt, on a replexfin bond. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County: the Hon. Martin W. Schaefer. Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1900.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Bigelow
delivered the opinion of the court.
We would be justified in afiirming the judgment in this case, for the reason that appellants’ counsel have neglected to comply with the following portion of Rule 25 of this court, viz.:
“ The brief of appellant or plaintiff in error shall contain in the beginning a concise statement of the case, including, in a general way, the form of action, the substance of the pleadings, without detail, the substance of the evidence, * * * the judgment, and the rulings of the trial court complained of.”
But we forbear disposing of the case in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hays v. BeairdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hercules Coal & Mining Co. v. Central Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. BrodyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- Greer v. ClayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- McKeand v. FeinbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908