Legal Opinion

Maresco v. Mechanics & Metals National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlatzek, J.

The action is by a depositor to recover from his bank the amount of a forged check paid by the bank and charged against his account. The defense is that two forged checks were paid; that the depositor, knowing of both payments, brought action and recovered judgment for the amount of one of the checks, and that that judgment is a bar to the present action subsequently brought for the amount paid on the other check. The argument is that there was a single contract between the bank and its depositor which governed their continuing relations; that by that agreement the bank undertook to pay out…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Pakas v. . HollingsheadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. K. & K. Silk Trimming Co. v. Garfield National BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API