Legal Opinion

John Rutherford v. Judge & Dolph, L

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 4, 2013No. 09-3706PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

In this suit brought under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, Plaintiffs-Appellants sue their former employer, Judge & Dolph, for terminating their employment on grounds forbidden by a collective bargaining agreement, and their union, Local 705, for settling their grievances for an unsatisfactory sum, allegedly violating its duty of fair representation. The district court granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss, and Plaintiffs appealed.

But we lack jurisdiction over the employees’ claim against Local 705. “Hybrid” claims for violations of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Steven Olson v. Bemis Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Amari Co. v. BurgessDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Singer v. Reg'l Transp. Auth. & Pace Suburban Bus Serv.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Kadambi v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API