Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The crime of which the defendant was convicted is one of the most serious known to’ the law. This court, ever since Conners v. State, 47 Wis. 523, 2 N. W. 1143, has consistently adhered to a strict rule as to the proof required in such cases. Whittaker v. State, 50 Wis. 518, 7 N. W. 431; Bohlmann v. State, 98 Wis. 617, 74 N. W. 343; O’Boyle v. State, 100 Wis. 296, 75 N. W. 989; Devoy v. State, 122 Wis. 148, 99 N. W. 455; Brown v. State, 127 Wis. 193, 106 N. W. 536; McLain v. State, 159 Wis. 204, 149 N. W. 771; B- v. State, 166 Wis. 525, 166 N. W. 32; Purpero v. State, 190 Wis. 363, 208 N. W.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Conners v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Devoy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. O'Boyle v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McLain v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Hazel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. State v. SchmearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. WatersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API