Legal Opinion

United States v. Darrell Mark Babcock

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 24, 2019No. 17-13678PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge:

In this case, police officers investigating a domestic disturbance confiscated a suspect's cell phone and held it for two days before eventually obtaining a warrant to search it. The appeal before us presents two Fourth Amendment questions. First, was the seizure justified on the ground that the officers had reasonable suspicion to believe that the phone's owner was engaged in criminal wrongdoing-was it, in effect, a permissible " Terry stop" of the phone? We hold that it was not. Second, in the particular circumstances of this case, did the officers have probable cause…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Daniel Robbins v. City of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. James Bernard BraddyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Babcock v. OlsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
  5. Cierra Dunn v. John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API