Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Daniel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1944No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 42,626Published

1Opinion of the CourtBhshnelu, J.

The trial judge sitting without a, jury determined that plaintiffs, as assignees of Roy Travis, a cement subcontractor, were entitled to a judgment against defendant C. E. Daniel, a general contractor, in the amount of $488.14, for labor and material involved in the reconstruction of a sidewalk in front of a four-store building in the city of Port Huron, which Daniel constructed for Kate S. Jenks.

Controversies between the owner, Jenks, and the general contractor, Daniel, were determined in Jenks v. Daniel, 304 Mich. 239. The opinion in that case does not refer to Travis who, as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallory v. PitcairnMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Jenks v. DanielMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API