Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holder v. Orange Grove Medical Specialties, P.A.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2010No. 2008-CT-01442-SCTPublished

1DissentKitchens, Justice

¶ 39. Because lesser sanctions would better serve the interests of justice, and because the Court of Appeals accurately analyzed the law and reached the correct result, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 40. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s dismissal because, in its view — and in mine — lesser sanctions were warranted under the circumstances. Holder v. Orange Grove Med. Specialties, P.A., 54 So.3d 244, 251-52, 252-53, ¶¶ 37-38, 42 (Miss.Ct.App.2010) (citing Cox v. Cox, 976 So.2d 869, 879 (Miss.2008)). Specifically, the Court of Appeals held:

According to our supreme court, lesser…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. De La Beckwith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnny B. McGOWAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAULKNER CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Watson v. LillardMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Days InnMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API