Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grimes

Pittsylvania County Circuit Court

Decided October 28, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr.

The Defendants in this matter have asserted that they have a right to a trial before a juiy on the charges of contempt of the Pittsylvania County Circuit Court. Conversely, the Special Prosecutor urges the Court to deny the Defendants’ request on the basis that the period of incarceration being sought by the Commonwealth will not exceed five months and, as such, the charge constitutes a petty offense that does not trigger the right to trial by jury. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that, under the facts of this case, the Defendants do not have a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Baugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API