State v. Cruz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The state seeks common law certiorari review of a non-final order excluding the testimony of a confidential informant at trial. We conclude that the lower court’s order departed from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, we grant the petition and quash the order under review.
Jorge Santiago Cruz was charged with one count of attempted trafficking in cocaine and one count of conspiracy to sell, manufacture, or deliver cocaine. His defense counsel filed a request for certain information about the confidential informant (“Cl”) used in this case pursuant to Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RambaranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008