Legal Opinion

Joiner v. Firemen's Ins.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1934No. Nos. 59, 60Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

The defendants deny liability under fire insurance policies on the dwelling because the insured was not the sole and unconditional owner in fee, for that an interest in the property was purportedly conveyed to Mm by a married woman without the joinder of her husband in the body of the deed. Questions as to validity of deeds are determined by the laws of the. state where the land lies. Haas v. Rendleman (C. C. A. 4th) 62 F.(2d) 701.

The Constitution of North Carolina, art. 10, § 6) provides that the wife may convey her realty “with the written assent of her husband * * *…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warren v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Raleigh Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Ferguson v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  5. Haas v. RendlemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API