Legal Opinion

C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 12, 1971No. C.R.D. 71-4; C.D. 4252; protest 67/25245 on rags and scrap cordagePublished

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

Defendant has moved, under Rule 4.7 (b) of the Rules of this Court, to dismiss the above-entitled action on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim, (1) because the protest involved a claim for an allowance for excessive impurities but protestant did not file an application for such allow-*607anee on Customs Form 4317 as required by section 15.7(a) of the Customs Regulations, as amended, and (2) because the complaint raises a new claim of improper classification of the merchandise which is alleged to be unrelated to the administrative decision made in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cinder Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API