Legal Opinion
Lund v. Unum Life Insurance of America
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 17, 1998No. 2:96 CV 474KPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBALL, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiff Rallet Lund’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendant Unum Life Insurance of America (“Unum”), Defendant Murdock Travel Inc.’s (“Murdock”) Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions against Unum.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff worked for Murdock as a sales person from June 1990 until March 31, 1993. As a Murdock employee, she participated in an employee benefits plan that included disability insurance, provided by Unum and covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MacMillan v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Phila.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Barnable v. First Fortis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Fitts v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Dion v. Imperva IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Jackson v. City of ModestoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021