Claim of Rosen v. First Manhattan Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrew Iii, J.
Although we agree with the majority that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Workers’ Compensation Board’s finding that decedent’s death occurred in the course of his employment, we are of the view that the presumption afforded by Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 has been rebutted by substantial evidence to the contrary and, therefore, the determination that decedent’s death arose out of his employment must be set aside (see generally, Matter of Cuervo v CAB Motor Co., 133 AD2d 894, 895). As the majority correctly notes, the appropriate inquiry is whether the underlying…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Seymour v. Rivera Appliances Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Mintiks v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Privatera v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Claim of Arrington v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Cuervo v. CAB Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987