State v. Passons
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRODY, Justice.
This appeal arises from Russell Allen Passons's motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Idaho Criminal Rule 35. The district court denied the motion on the basis of controlling precedent of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals relied on that precedent to affirm the district court's decision. We granted Passons's petition for review, and now affirm the decision of the district court.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2012, Passons was charged with two counts of aggravated assault and a third count of burglary. He was later convicted by a jury of all three…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BernalIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Creech v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- Hollis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.