Legal Opinion

State v. Passons

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2018No. Docket 45455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRODY, Justice.

This appeal arises from Russell Allen Passons's motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Idaho Criminal Rule 35. The district court denied the motion on the basis of controlling precedent of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals relied on that precedent to affirm the district court's decision. We granted Passons's petition for review, and now affirm the decision of the district court.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2012, Passons was charged with two counts of aggravated assault and a third count of burglary. He was later convicted by a jury of all three…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BernalIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Creech v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Hollis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API