Hines v. Consumers' Ice Light Company

The law is well settled that one who goes upon the premises of another, not as an employee or as 'inviteé, but merely as a licensee, takes his license with its concomitant perils, and that the owner owes him no affirmative' duty of protestation; the measure of the owner’s duty being merely the negative one to do no act to cause injury after the presence of the licensee is discovered. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Tomlinson, 69 Ark. 489; Arkansas & Louisiana Ry. Co. v. Sain, 90 Ark. 278; St. L. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Pyles, 114 Ark. 218; C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Russell, 136 Ark. 365; Mitchell v.…