Legal Opinion
Ramey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 2008No. 06-AA-743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner filed a claim for workers’ compensation arising from work-related events that occurred on August 30, 2003, which he alleged had caused him to develop post-traumatic stress disorder. He sought benefits for temporary total disability from November 3, 2003, to the present and continuing, and payment of medical expenses.
Because the employer (PEPCO) contested the claim, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) held an evidentiary hearing, following which she concluded that petitioner’s “claim for benefits [was] not compensable, in that [Ramey] did not sustain [an] employment-related emotional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Spartin v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Landesberg v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sturgis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Porter v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brenda Johnson v. D.C. Dept. of Emp't Servs. / Federal Express Corp. & Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017