Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. Lucky Nine, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1963No. 63-240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reconsidered this appeal upon petition for rehearing and have receded from our former judgment of affirmance. The question involved is whether or not a complaint should be' dismissed upon the basis that the action contained therein appears to be res judicata.

It affirmatively appears from a complaint filed by the United States Rubber Company that it had accounts against two corporations. One corporation was known as Lucky Nine, Inc. and the other as Lucky Five, Inc. Each account was guaranteed by Robert D. Grossman, one of the appel-lees here. The rubber company sued Lucky Nine, Inc.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hough v. MensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Vineseck v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Ferrall v. BradfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1849
  4. Sacks v. RicklesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Anton v. DonnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Diaz v. BravoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Liberoff v. LiberoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API