Legal Opinion

Whitsett v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The record in this case presents a question of ac'cord and satisfaction, which arises upon a demurrer to the amended answer.

The action is upon' a promissory note executed by the appellant to the appellee, for the sum of $2,378.42, bearing date July 24, 1874, payable one month after date, with interest at 1-12 per cent, per month from date until paid. Suit was instituted thereon October 17, 1879.

The amended answer sets up as a defense to the whole cause of action, except the sum of one dollar, an agreement entered into-between the plaintiffs and defendant on or about the 26th of October, 1879,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Kellogg v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Babcock & Russell v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  4. Russell v. LytleNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. State v. BennerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wind v. England Walton & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  2. Hanson v. McCannColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Strobridge Lithographing Co. v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Trinidad v. Trinidad Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Hanson v. McCannColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API