State v. In the Interest of G.B.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
The state appeals from an order suppressing certain evidence given to a police officer by the appellee at the time of his arrest for possession of alcohol by a minor. The state asserts on appeal that the failure to give Miranda warnings did not require suppression of the evidence in question because (1) appellant was not in custody at the time of the statements; (2) the information requested by the police officer was information related to routine booking procedures; and (3) the information contained in appellee’s driver's license was not testimonial in nature. From the record…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wasko v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. NovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Sapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.