Legal Opinion

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Nolden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1990No. 89-402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

This is a confused case involving child support. The parties 1 were originally di*1177vorced in New York and the New York court entered an order for child support. Thereafter, a URESA proceeding was instituted to enforce the New York support order against the obligor father who had at that time moved to Pasco County, Florida. There were certain URESA proceedings in Pasco County (some of which do not now appear to be relevant) including the entry of an order for support dated September, 1986. Thereafter the mother and children moved from New York to Hernando County, Florida, and on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cortina v. CortinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Manning v. VargesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Hammond v. HammondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. In Interest of DFWDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CITIZENS & PEOPLES NAT. BANK v. FutchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Geiger v. GeigerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. ColonelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API