Legal Opinion

Brubaker v. Deere & Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided October 16, 2009No. 3:08-cr-00113Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

CHARLES R. WOLLE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Three retirees of Deere & Company (“Deere”) filed this class action lawsuit against their former employer because of changes Deere made to their medical benefits, effective January 1, 2008. Deere manufacturers heavy equipment for use in the agriculture, construction, forestry and landscaping sectors, and has facilities worldwide including several within the jurisdiction of this court. Deere employs thousands of salaried, union and nonunion wage employees throughout its operations.

The retirees who…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. HeinzSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API