Legal Opinion

Gomez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1955No. 27615PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon an indictment charging the possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug, and alleging a prior conviction “of the less than capital offense of sale of a narcotic drug, an offense of like character and of the same nature as that hereinbefore charged against him in this cause,” appellant was found guilty by the jury and assessed a term of 20 years in the penitentiary.

Appellant urges that the indictment is not sufficient to charge a second offense under the Uniform Narcotics Drug Act. (Art. *31725b V.A.P.C.) and to support the enhanced punishment provided in Sec. 23 of said act as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Ex parte GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Aranda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API