Gomez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLEY, Judge.
Upon an indictment charging the possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug, and alleging a prior conviction “of the less than capital offense of sale of a narcotic drug, an offense of like character and of the same nature as that hereinbefore charged against him in this cause,” appellant was found guilty by the jury and assessed a term of 20 years in the penitentiary.
Appellant urges that the indictment is not sufficient to charge a second offense under the Uniform Narcotics Drug Act. (Art. *31725b V.A.P.C.) and to support the enhanced punishment provided in Sec. 23 of said act as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Ex parte GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Aranda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.