United States v. 1,048,000
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
This case was instituted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., for seizure and condemnation of a quantity of drug called “Afrodex” marketed by Bentex Pharmaceutical Company, claimant below. The libel alleges that Afrodex is misbranded under 21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1), and thus subject to seizure and condemnation pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 334, in that the article is, within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321 (p), a “new drug” whose labeling is not specified in an approved New Drug Application (NDA). The parties stipulate that if Afrodex is a “new…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. 7 CARTONS, MORE OR LESS, ETC.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1968
- United States v. ARTICLE OF DRUG, ETC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
- United States v. 1,048,000 CAPSULES, MORE OR LESS, ETC.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
- United States v. Article of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of the Following: 5,906 Boxes, Etc., United States of America v. Alcon Laboratories (Puerto Rico), Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Hurley v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.