Legal Opinion

In re Horwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It has been conclusively established that the respondent has been guilty of the practice of accepting retainers, signed in blank, from two laymen whom he knew as “ runners ” engaged in the business of soliciting negligence cases for attorneys, and that he, either before or after the settlement or other disposition of said cases, paid money to the “ runners ” as compensation for said retainers. The respondent confessedly accepted thirteen such retainers, twelve of which were accepted between May, 1935, and September, 1936.

He should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API