Legal Opinion

Tejada v. IN RE FORFEITURE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY $406,626.11 IN US CURRENCY

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 2002No. 3D00-3145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

820 So.2d 385 (2002)

Andres F. TEJADA, Appellant,

v.

In re FORFEITURE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: $406,626.11 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellee.

No. 3D00-3145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 29, 2002.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 2002.

J. James Donnellan, III, Miami, for appellant.

Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Israel Reyes, Assistant State Attorney; Adorno & Zeder, P.A., and Raoul G. Cantero, III, Miami, and Donna A. Weston, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

RAMIREZ, J.

Andres F. Tejada appeals a final order in a civil forfeiture action…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Promontory Enterprises, Inc. v. SOUTHERN ENGIN. & CONTRACT., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. PROGRESSIVE EXP. INS. CO., INC. v. MenendezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API