Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1973No. Civ. 40433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment declaring that a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board was not retroactively binding upon respondent City of Los Angeles in determining whether plaintiff’s (appellant’s) injury was caused by his employment, and that consequently appellant is not entitled to compensation under section 4.104 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

Appellant was employed by respondents as a civilian ambulance attendant between April 19, 1952, and August 22, 1970; thereby falling under the provisions of division 4, chapter 2, article 7, section 4.104…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Savelli v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Azadigian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Nagle v. Ringling Bros. & Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API