Legal Opinion

Herdman v. Oak Creek Florists (In re Oak Creek Florists)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 24, 1988No. Bankruptcy No. 3-86-03119; Adv. No. 3-87-0260Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUIRING FILING OR PROVIDING FOR DISMISSAL OF ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This proceeding which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order Of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K) — proceedings to determine the validity, extent, or priority of liens. Matter of Commercial Heat Treating of Dayton, Inc., 80 B.R. 880, 888 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1987). A brief review of the history…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
In Re Sandy Ridge Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
Talbot v. Warner (In Re Warner)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
Commercial Heat Treating of Dayton, Inc. v. Atlas Industries, Inc. (In Re Commercial Heat Treating of Dayton, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
Matos v. Gwinnett Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Matos)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.