Legal Opinion
United States v. Kemp
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 2005No. Criminal Action No. 04-370-02, Criminal Action No. 04-370-03, Criminal Action No. 04-370-04, Criminal Action No. 04-370-05, Criminal Action No. 04-370-06PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BAYLSON, J.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction.693
II. Motions for Judgment of Acquittal.696
III. Motions for New Trial-Common Issues.698
A. Refusal to Allow a Continuance of the Trial.698
B. Conduct of Voir Dire.699
C. The Court Did Not Abuse its Discretion in the Handling of the Voir Dire.703
D. The Court Did Not Abuse its Discretion in Excusing Juror No. 11.706
IV. Kemp’s Motions for New Trial — Applicable to Defendant Kemp.708
A. Kemp Has Not Shown Any Brady Violations Warranting a New Trial.708
1. Contentions of Defendant Kemp.708
2. Government’s Contentions.708
3. Discussion.708
B. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HolckDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wisdom v. PerezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023