Legal Opinion
Oticon, Inc. v. Sebotek Hearing Systems, LLC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 08-5489 (FLW)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendant Sound Design Technologies, Ltd. (“SDT”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff Oticon Inc. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against SDT and other defendants for patent infringement. SDT argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction over SDT because it does not have the minimum contacts with this forum required by Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945), to assert personal jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Plixer International, Inc. v. Scrutinizer GMBHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LpSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Swizz Style, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.