Legal Opinion

Hall v. United States Canning Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from trial term, Oneida county. Action by John E. Hall against the United States Canning Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made on the minutes, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcLENNAN, J.

This action was commenced on the 12th day of December, 1901, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, resulting from an accident which occurred on the 16th day •of July, 1901, alleged to have been caused through the negligence of the defendant. At all the times in question the defendant, a domestic -corporation, was engaged in operating a canning factory in the city of Rome, N. Y. One Stratton was superintendent and had general ■charge of defendant’s business .at that factory. He hired and discharged employés, and performed all other duties incident to his position. In case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cullen v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Manning v. Genesee River & Lake Ontario Streamboat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API