De Haven v. Williams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Philadelphia: To January Term 1874, No. 256. This was an action of assumpsit, brought November 1st 1873, by George C. Williams and Daniel Williams, executors, &c., of Anthony Williams, deceased, against Hugh De Haven and Alexander H. De Haven, trading as De Haven & Brother.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of Philadelphia: To January Term 1874, No. 256. This was an action of assumpsit, brought November 1st 1873, by George C. Williams and Daniel Williams, executors, &c., of Anthony Williams, deceased, against Hugh De Haven and Alexander H. De Haven, trading as De Haven & Brother. The claim of plaintiffs, as filed, was a deposit made by them with the defendants, who were bankers; the affidavit of claim was as follows: — ■ “ That the plaintiffs in this suit, as executors of the last will and testament of Anthony Williams, deceased, lent to the defendants in this suit,…
1Opinion of the Court
'Judgment was entered in the Supreme Court,
2Per curiam
The well-considered opinion of Judge Hare sufficiently vindicates his ruling. For the reasons given by him the judgment is affirmed.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fesmire v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- In Re Johnson's Estate & GuardianshipWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Alanko v. WaymanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Benezet v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- McManus's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.