Legal Opinion

In re Daniel M.

New York City Family Court

Decided June 2, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sara P. Schechter, J.

Before the court is a petition to extend placement of Daniel M., who will be eight years old this month. The extension itself is uncontested. The matter in dispute is the service plan for the child. The Law Guardian moves for an order directing that Daniel be placed in the certified foster home of P. and J. S. of Rock Fall, Connecticut, and for a further order that the Commissioner of Social Services pay for four hours a day of skilled nursing care over and above the foster care rate. The Commissioner opposes on the grounds that the payment for nursing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Riddle v. RappNew York City Family Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Nicole JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re Andrea D.New York City Family Court · 2009
  3. In re a Permanency Hearing Concerning Angel P.New York Family Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API